Archive

Education

Narratives of Humanity, Higher Learning and the Challenge of AI

New book: Edward Elgar Publishing announced the publication of Higher Education in the Age of AI:

This timely book examines the myriad ways that AI is shaping higher education. Stefan Popenici analyses the current dynamics and ideologies driving AI development, as well as the intentions behind its usage and its resulting implications for pedagogical equity. The author argues that higher education is becoming increasingly distanced from its core aims and values, presenting significant risks to our capacity to solve current and future global crises.

The book explores the effects of AI colonisation, addressing key ideological and epistemological tensions including algorithmic bias, the potential for misinformation, AI-based plagiarism and the loss of original thinking. The author draws on various case studies to demonstrate the harmful impact of AI technologies on trust, which results in a loss of agency for institutions, teachers and students. Employing critical analysis and evidence-based insights, Popenici demonstrates that a human-centered approach to higher education is essential for its long-term sustainability.

Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence is a valuable resource for scholars and students of educational technology and educational psychology, as well as scholars investigating AI governance and privacy digital rights. Highlighting crucial implications for curriculums, assessments and general academic integrity, this book is also beneficial for university leaders and governance bodies looking to develop effective policies and AI guardrails.

Book cover: Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Narratives of Humanity, Higher Learning and the Challenge of AI by Stefan Popenici

Critical acclaim

‘Stefan Popenici methodically and eloquently unpacks, critiques, and exposes the latest “silver bullet” being sold to education: Artificial Intelligence. More than a book, this is a fiery and necessary wake-up call.’
– George Veletsianos, University of Minnesota, USA

‘This book represents a crafted counter-revolution to face diligently the abuse of both AI providers and deployers. It raises fundamental questions on the accountability of shrewd leaders aiming to control human decisions and wellbeing. Understanding these challenges are crucial for insuring compliance and harnessing AI’s transformative power. The text is a wake-up call for everyone, not only for educators. It provides essential tools for a sustainable understanding of our times.’
– Eny V. Di Iorio, Lorenzo de” Medici Institute, Italy

‘Popenici’s work is to AI techno-solutionism what due diligence and simple truths are to snake oil salespeople: a sobering look at what is really there. This book offers a discerning antidote to the idea that education is a problem in need of solving rather than a human institution worth safeguarding from Big Tech’s corporate impulses.’
– Benjamin Nickl, The University of Sydney, Australia

‘Stefan Popenici’s Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence is a bracing antidote to technosolutionism: historically grounded, politically alert, and fiercely on the side of academic values. If you want to understand what AI is doing to universities – and what we can do in return – start here. This book is a must-read for anyone who cares about higher education.’
– Jürgen Rudolph, Murdoch University, Singapore

‘If there is one book that you should read to get a grip on the challenges faced by higher education with the advent of ever greater use of AI, then I recommend this one.’
– Mike Osborne, University of Glasgow, UK

This book is available to order on the EEP website

26 August 2021

In 2013 the American scholar Noam Chomsky lamented in a public speech the fact that corporations and the wealthiest Americans viscerally oppose the concept of ‘common good’. He warned that we are all at a moment of a concerted attack on “any rational and humane concept of the ‘common good’, sometimes in ways that are not only shocking, but also spell disaster for the species”.

Later that year the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, delivered a passionate speech focused on the idea that inequality is essential to fostering “the spirit of envy” and greed should be nurtured as a “valuable spur to economic activity” (The Guardian, 2013). He emphasised his position with a telling note on groups of people with low intelligence scores, seemingly ignoring the fascist history of that argument: “it is surely relevant to a conversation about equality that as many as 16% of our species have an IQ below 85 while about 2%…” using a rhetorical trick to make clear that his audience is having a high IQ, above 130.

We know now that the former gossip journalist who reached the position of Mayor of London became so popular with his ideas that he was elected (and still serves) as Prime Minister of UK. The ideas pilfered from some neoliberal think tank and other neoliberal groups were not limited to a kitsch discourse but are part of our life as a widely accepted doctrine. The cartoonish character is representative for our times; without depth, he is inspiring others to follow his model of sociopathic individualism and unscrupulous behaviour. With a manifest disregard for any sense of loyalty, love, compassion or care for truth, he was elected by people because we collectively normalised that set of antisocial values.

The inherent sociopathy of various prominent politicians, such as Boris Johnson or Trump, work as a source of inspiration for many. It is intentional. The only trick left was to make people believe that others are stupid and ‘poorly educated” (Trump’s favourite group of voters). The old Fascist logic of ‘us” versus ‘them’ was revitalised to gain popularity and power. It was repeated that “others” are exploited, and ‘others’ are ‘sheep’, the blind and manipulated. ‘They’ will work their entire life just to increase profit margins to some exploitative industries and abysmally rich tycoons. It is comforting to hear the message that “you”, so smart and strongly attached to the ideas of success and strength, are different. It is implied that “life will be great for people like you” and if it isn’t… then is just a matter of time to make it great. Or make it ‘great again’.

The idea of Common Good is at this moment of 21st century marginal or openly ridiculed, a vestige of times when empathy, kindness and care for others meant more than just a glossy leaflet where mission statements use them simply for their decorative effect. Recently, an article in The Atlantic is making this point, noting that “Some Americans No Longer Believe in the Common Good. They now are thinking only of themselves.” The author shares the concern that an increasing number of people simply don’t care if others are infected or even lose their life when all that is required is something as basic as wearing a mask in a pandemic that already caused the death of millions. This is happening in other parts of the world, not only in the United States; what is new is that this the pandemic is forcing us to drop the panglossian pretence and face realities. It is not all “positive” as it was stridently presented; not all things end on a positive note, and it is now painfully real that real life is not always playing on one single note, but on a variety of tones, some tragic and some soothing.

The reality is that we built societies on an idea of success that is entirely disconnected from any sense of social obligations. This is going beyond the old West vs. East differences. In the new context we find a country like China as one of the most ruthlessly capitalist country in the world, even when is being led by an elite that insist to be called “communist”. In fact, the only communist part left in China is the dictatorial reflex of Stalinism. The arrangements of economic life in China stay closer to America than any country or economy in the Northern Europe, for example.

The pandemic forced us to see that what we call “essential workers” have a miserable salary and most make the least money nationwide. We collectively realised that nurses, cleaners, doctors, teachers and so many others who are “key workers” for our societies cannot secure a decent living with their incomes in the areas where they work. This is not possible to be ignored anymore.

The glorification of a ruthless, randian, sociopathic capitalism is less appealing when we see that decades of tax cuts for the rich and constant trimming of budgets allocated to healthcare left us with a small number of hospitals, doctors and nurses. When a pandemic hits any appealing propaganda narrative is crushed by the reality is that all beds are taken and there are not even enough ambulances left. The illusion that ‘one day’ you can be successful just because you embrace the same narrative with the rich is gone when there is no nurse left to help you survive.

Covid-19 is still used to find excuses for flaws that have causes in decisions taken long before this virus was reported. At the same time, this pandemic makes visible what neoliberal propaganda managed to drown in vast volumes of information of meaningless entertainment. The stated value placed in individualism disappeared when profits were threatened by the need to protect people’s health and lives in the pandemic. “We have to live our lives”, “we can let it rip and reach herd immunity” even if this translates in tens of thousands of deaths (see the case of UK). The fact that ‘herd immunity’ cannot be reached when parts of population are not even considered (i.e. children) or that science proves that made-up numbers can’t make it work (e.g. BBC provides here a very useful video on how herd immunity can be reached) is ignored. The problem is that all these strident acts of mismanagement, cynicism, arrogance and disregard of humanity are impossible to be twisted into something else. One can’t twist preventable death for long. How much neoliberalism values human life looks different now, in the light of what happened in the last two years of this pandemic.

We have now a globalised world where the most important workers for society are paid the least. A CEO or a destructive corporation is often paid as much as all teachers in a state – or even more. When the world literally burns and weather is causing unprecedented damage due to climate change, in the middle of the pandemic, the very rich have nothing better to do than run in a shockingly immature competition of spending millions to prove who goes faster and stay longer in space.

We see clearly the price of this set of choices: very influential idiots who change our lives show their profound disgust for the idea of common good. The only visible concern for this global ruling class is to protect their irrational aberrations, even if this will cause death and irreparable damage around them.

The general assault against what really matters in education in the so-called “neoliberal era” is visible today. Health and education, the most important sectors for the advancement of common good, where targeted for decades with consecutive budget cuts and ideological pressure. We pick up now the fruits of new public management and other fads imposed with force by neoliberal groups. It also includes crowds of ‘poorly educated’, those who are supporting a range of absurd conspiracy theories or approaches indifferent to human life. For an open, educated mind they are just too absurd and it is hard to believe that one can seriously consider them. Here Borat found an endless source of humour; while it is good that we had the laugh we have to find a solution.

The inane and obsessive fixation in higher education on various “disruptions”, which promised ‘efficiencies”, “innovations” and other goods – but delivered nothing of substance, or nothing good – can finally find a space for application. And all that energy spent on building the next ‘disruptive’ thing can be used to deal with the real turmoil that is engulfing schooling and higher education.

We know at this point that Chomsky’s warnings were ignored. Unfortunately, he was right: we have now visible crises that spell clearly disaster for humanity. Covid-19 is forcing us all to look at the crisis and all that is uncovered as it is. The devastating impact on universities, health systems, economies and – most importantly – on our lived (not just stated) values is raising vital questions about how we reached this low point. Most importantly, it makes even the most naive, oblivious and thick leaders across all fields to realise that we are all in a new place, at a very different moment.

The sad irony of the ‘post-truth era’ is that facts insist to show up as they are. For example, many spreaders of lies about COVID-19 had to deal with this virus themselves, some losing their life. Climate change deniers watched their homes go up in flames or hit by deluge. That’s a brutal way to get in contact with facts, as they are. It is also impossible to deny it.

Mike Tyson supposedly had said that “Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face.” We see now that everybody likes a reassuring lie until facts hit back with vengeance. In this new reality we have another chance to answer some uncomfortable questions about our values, priorities and what realistic pathways we can use to deal with the pandemic and the most vital crisis, the climate change.

Concrete

Youth is facing the income gap, the inequality gap, the opportunity gap, the health gap, and the access to education gap. It is a difficult time! There is also the justice gap. There are now major international banks publicly admitting that they were dealing money for drug cartels, but nobody goes to prison. A young men from a poor neighbourhood that is not very far from Wall Street or the London city is often imprisoned immediately for a minor crime, like possession of one or two cigarettes of marijuana. It becomes clear that if you can afford to pay fines like that of $1.9 billion paid by HSBC you can engage freely in money-laundering for some of the most ruthless criminal gangs in the drug world. The reality is – beyond the rhetoric and demagogy – that too many times rich can get away with anything!

The recent (and endlessly appalling) scandal of FIFA reveals much more than a simple story about an international federation of sport. A recent article went as far as saying that this is an unfolding narrative that explains the arrangements in the current world. It is clear that this FIFA-saga proves that one can engage in outrageous corrupt practices for decades even if this is ruining some of the most popular sports in the world, if dirty money oil the wheels of the system. One can rule with astounding impunity, with a style that could inspire even some of the most evil and experienced dictators, and no European justice system will ever bother you. Hope for European youth just got another hit.

It is relevant to remind here that FIFA is remunerating – officially! – its staff 34% more than hedge funds and 25% more than banks award their traders. Imagine now that you have a graduate diploma in your hands, but no house, no job (not even the prospect for a decent job) and hear the news about tens of millions of dollars in bribes and implausible arrogance and luxury going on for a lifetime… This is the situation for millions of graduates. It cannot ever feel right. Outrage is just a natural reaction to this. Youth is in crisis, the system is in crisis and the world is shaking behind ‘potemkin village’ screens. It may be safe at this point to remember that the rise of evil was was completely underestimated back in 1920’s.

Youth is in crisis, the system is in crisis and the world is shaking behind ‘potemkin village’ screens. It may be safe at this point to remember that the rise of evil was completely underestimated back in 1920’s.

Youth Marginalization and the Rise of Risks

While institutions like FIFA, many international banks and corporations are engulfed in scandals about grotesque corruption, some European countries are confronted with youth unemployment that is higher than even in a failed state like Libya. The startling reality is that youth in Greece, Spain or Croatia have now smaller chances to get a job than those who are living in some countries that are devastated by war.

This is just part of a general bleak picture. In countries where the situation was not as critical, unemployment recently climbed to new records. In France, unemployment reached new highs in April this year. The International Labour Organisation is warning that ‘the world is facing a worsening youth employment crisis’ and the situation is not improving in the European Union. 

Australia, a country able to avoid the effects of the global financial crisis, currently registers a steep increase in youth unemployment. In a report released by the Treasurer J. B. Hockey, we find that “the rate of youth unemployment sits at 14.2 per cent as of January 2015”. This is a two-decade high. It is also known that Australian graduates have in the last years a very difficult time.

In the United States, the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce recently published a report documenting that long-term and high rates of youth unemployment (18- to 34 year-olds) costs up to $25 billion a year in uncollected taxes and increased safety net expenditure. The lost potential and long-term effects can be imagined. 

This makes some few sober and realistic politicians wonder if this crisis is not already too dangerous. In 2013, the German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble was worried that youth unemployment could lead Europe to severe social unrest, talking about a possible revolution. Currently, over 5 million young Europeans – one in four of those eligible to work – are currently looking for a job. In the last months of 2014, French President François Hollande said in a news conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the Italian Premier Matteo Renzi that “This is the major challenge for Europe. If we are not capable or offering hope to the next generation, people will turn their backs on Europe. We see the risk, we see the threat.

The threat is much more serious than this and events after that conference proved it in a dramatic and horrifying succession of events.

Old Devil, New Faces

The threat is not only to turn their backs to Europe, but to turn their face to what can channel their frustrations or bring a sense of belonging, even if this is against all human values. In Europe and other parts of the world, many already turned their faces to a sinister shadow of recent history: extreme political movements, right and left. When disillusioned youth contemplates their lack of perspective, cynicism and corruption of many current leaders, some well-versed demagogues are able to use this sense of desperation and disillusionment for their own purposes. It often looks like a reconstruction of the horrible trail of what Tismaneanu calls the Devil in History.

The new fascisms are much more potent than only open the painful wounds of the past. Especially in Europe, a continent almost completely destroyed by the twisted ideologies of the extreme left and extreme right in the last century, it is unthinkable to hear that crowds in France yelled “Death to Jews” after ShoahThe new century finds innocent people killed for going to a Jewish museum or a kosher supermarket and synagogues are attacked across Europe. Lessons of the twentieth century are long forgotten at the grassroots level, where the youth lives today. This is also happening because political leaders, academia and in general  intelligentsia indulged for decades in a parallel existence where corruption looks less like a withering practice for economy and social fabric, but more as a sign of real stamina in people able to succeed. Increasing warning signs were covered for a long time with a rhetoric of demagogical promises, echo chambers and a constant effort to silence whistleblowers.

The reality is as bad as we can imagine when we see that reputed newspapers have headlines such as Antisemitism on rise across Europe ‘in worst times since the Nazis’. It is time to admit that something went very wrong if we are at the point where the horror of what Nazis represent for Europe and humanity mean so little that we really contemplate a replay of their times.

Youth is often part of these movements and there are many fast to blame again the new generation. But the so-called “entitlement” of a generation labeled as ‘X’, ‘millennials’, ‘Me generation’ or ‘the lost generation’ is part a simplistic stereotype and a convenient jeremiad chanted at the boys’ club on same nostalgic lines about some imagined good old times. It may be the entitlement for some, and also a real clash between the high expectations cultivated for youth. This was promoted with irresponsible cynicism for comfort, votes, and other vain interests. These high expectations now collide with the very grim reality of unemployment and underemployment, NEETs and inequality, lack of a coherent present and perspectives for a better future. The gap is too big! 

Effects of this complex reality are erupting now in various ways: some genuine forms of protests and indignation or cohorts lured by extremists and fascists. These parties are interested to channel exasperation into rage and hate, to grow the membership of their movements. This explains why the danger of fascism, anti-democratic and extremist movements is not requiring now any astute analysis or inspired predictions, but a simple reading of political polls are election results. The rise of neo-fascist and extreme left political parties in Europe cannot be ignored anymore. Openly neo-Nazi parties sit now in Brussels in the European Parliament, next to the far-left parties, equally dangerous for stability and the future, as Greece will show soon. The extreme left and the extreme right have now a type collaboration that is just fueling the risk, as a group of madmen are playing with fire. When Syriza, the Greek far-left party, was aiming to win Greece’s parliamentary elections, Marine Le Pen, the leader of the French extreme-right party, 

When Syriza, the Greek far-left party, was aiming to win Greece’s parliamentary elections, Marine Le Pen, the leader of the French extreme-right party, publicly announced support for the extremists on the left. Not that Neo-Nazis were not popular in Greece. The Golden Dawn was expected to come third in the Greek parliamentary elections – but this was not on the agenda for their sister-movement in France. The National Front in France, the PEGIDA in Germany, Jobbik in Hungary (…and to have a glimpse at how these parties understand society we can remind that Jobbik’s deputy parliamentary leader Márton Gyöngyösi said in a public address that “…it is timely to tally up people of Jewish ancestry who live here, especially in the Hungarian parliament and the Hungarian government, who, indeed, pose a national security risk to Hungary”), Holocaust denialists in the Romanian government, the neo-nazi Golden Dawn in Greece, Geert Wilders’ ‘Party for Freedom’, the Austrian Freedom Party or Britain’s Ukip… are just part of a long and truly scary list of extreme right movements taking centre stage in elections, local and central parliaments. 

Moving from a repugnant eccentricity, extreme-right recently announced forming a new political bloc in the European Parliament to gain more power and influence. How is this even possible? Of course, a long time of ‘guilty innocence’ of European elites, of denial and corruption is to blame. But the current context is also important. Russia’s leader Vladimir Putin is strengthening his version of a fascist state with a bellicose political strategy based on military aggression and intimidation of Europe and its allies (the Russian invasion the Republic of Georgia in 2008 was just an opening move for what is happening now in Ukraine). The Newsweek and many other political outlets and analysts (see here and here other examples) document the fact that Putin’s Russia Is in the Grip of Fascism

The flames of extreme nationalism and intolerance can get out of control (as it always happened in the past). It is also important to realize that Putin’s regime is actively engaged in a “state-sponsored subversion of European democratic systems“. This translates into a constant investment in extremist parties across Europe and their propaganda machines. Uncovering the source of generous funding for the abominable political fringe explains just in part the current disturbing puzzle of the European political landscape, or why the extremists parties were on the rise. It is time to admit that the danger is real. The fascist temptation is a very dangerous game for Russia, for Europe and for the world.

The Reality Gap

It is interesting to see how far the economic, cultural or political elites are from the realities of common citizens. We can think about the surprising remarks of US President Obama, who underlined in his address to the United Nations General Assembly that “this is the best time in human history to be born”. It cannot be comforting for millions of people displaced by all wars across the globe, reaching record numbers after WWII, or for people experiencing the horrors of ISIS and Islamofascism. It is also hardly possible to say that it is the best time to be born when inequality is constantly rising for the last 30 years in all countries, reaching in some cases ‘historical highs‘ (according to OECD studies). It is hardly possible to be cheerful when you find that “Across the world the 80 richest people have as much wealth as the 3.5 billion poorest. In Australia, the richest 1% are as rich as the poorest 60% of Australians.

Especially in the United States may be a difficult time to be born if we consider that the pace of growing inequality is reaching levels seen only before the 1928 Depression. There were ‘45.3 million people living at or below the poverty line in 2013′ there are many new mothers that may find hard to adopt this extreme optimism. Especially when we consider that studies show that being poor is affecting the human brain starting from kindergarten.

There are many ways to explore how the current disconnect between elites and the living reality developed to the current magnitude. It is difficult to find reasons for the current cynicism displayed by most who have the power to change. But a simple event may help. For example, David Brooks, a New York Times columnist, was recently invited to talk about his latest book, ‘The Road to Character’ in a recent TV show on Australian television. The interviewer is well known for his astute observations and line of questioning. In this particular instance he was at one point inquiring about the past where some values were strong – according to him – even though it was much worse, as the world after the war  had “racism and antisemitism”. Of course, the interviewer was implying that we live better times. These problems of the past are long gone and we still find our way to balance and strong character. This is more than just amazingly naive and irresponsible. It is speaking about a certain space where the world really looks different. The real news for the ‘old boys club’ is that it is truly terrible to be poor, it is not safe at all to be part of a religious or ethnic minority in almost every country around the world and so on.

A recent New York Times article presents the terrifying reality in the heart Europe:

<< …last year, according to the French Interior Ministry, 51 percent of all racist attacks targeted Jews. The statistics in other countries, including Great Britain, are similarly dismal. In 2014, Jews in Europe were murdered, raped, beaten, stalked, chased, harassed, spat on, and insulted for being Jewish. Sale Juif—“dirty Jew”—rang in the streets, as did “Death to the Jews,” and “Jews to the gas.” >>

It is not the best time to be born a Gypsy in Europe as it is not an easy time to be born an African American in the United States. The Confederate flag still flies high in the US and survivors are still in shock in the aftermath of the racial terrorist attack in Charleston. Indigenous people in Australia still have a very hard time and First Nations in Canada or Latin America have some of the most difficult tests of their existence, as their cultural marginalisation is doubled by that their environment is poisoned or completely destroyed. Despite progress – even in the most advanced societies and economies – we still find a gender pay gap and systemic discrimination against women. There is no doubt that people in various positions of power can high-five in meetings and congratulate each other in front of various banners announcing ‘mission accomplished’, but this kind of refuge from reality is always coming with a very high price!

The Road to Radical Mediocrity in Education

Vulnerable youth and disenfranchised voters are lured too often by half-truths and demagogical propaganda of extremist movements across the world and it is not Kremlin behind all these movements. It just happens that in Europe they found a weak point in line with the political beliefs at home. We can now see that Islamofascism is growing along with islamophobia. Extremes – Right, Left, religious or religiously against religion – are always despicable and dangerous. In the United States, the growing threat is well summarized in a recent article published by the New York Times: “…headlines can mislead. The main terrorist threat in the United States is not from violent Muslim extremists, but from right-wing extremists. Just ask the police.

It may be the right time to get less hysterical about what mass media feeds us and use our collective brains to see if the right-wing extremists are not among us, if our societies are still compassionate and inclusive. We still hold our values or play and twist them when convenient to create new repressive rules. How many universities do you know talking publicly about this topic?

Of course, the only efficient way to fight manipulation and being mislead by sleek PR, headlines and propaganda is education. Education alone can separate what is decent and useful from manipulation and all the loathsome nonsense that is used to fuel hate and violence in the name of race, religion, gender, national or sexual identities. Educated minds have a common characteristic across ages and generations: a healthy curiosity.

This feature translates into an irresistible urge to place a foundational question mark next to all that seems to matter. It is a feature of those questioning dogmas and accepted truths, exploring different perspectives, challenging favored or adored ideas just because they seem wrong or can be improved, abandoning the comfort of convenient and familiar spaces to explore the unknown and find more. This is not only what is behind the progress of humanity, but it is what preserves our humanity.

An educated mind is what is changing the path from a herd life, a regimented existence that is apparently convenient, just because it limits the horizon. It is much easier to stir the fear and hostility to all that is unknown and unfamiliar in someone living with prepackaged answers, but this existence is always vulnerable to manipulation and servitude. Again, education is the main solution to cultivate human values, freedom, and a decent life. This is why education is not only a privilege for those who teach – who should, and used to be, respected for doing this difficult task – but a tremendous responsibility. 

The problem is that education is not in a very good state. Among a long list of vital problems, there is a very serious global teacher shortage. The chronic lack of trained teachers leads to a continuous drop of standards, even if they were in many countries already abysmally low. Data recently released by UNESCO shows that ’27 million teachers will be needed to achieve universal primary education by 2030′. Teachers are valued in very few countries. In general, we find them treated well in political discourses and despised in practice, as people with not-so-serious jobs. There are already too many teachers that not truly qualified to teach in any classroom. Against the myth, current arrangements do not make this the most attractive career and this is quite a difficult job if done right.

Along with the belligerent anti-science crowd attacking it, education is pushed by various forces to radical mediocrity, to a fundamentalist average.

Traditionally, universities have the responsibility to protect society, human values and civilization. Unfortunately, with very few exceptions we find education deeply muddled into a succession of fads and shallow approaches. Some blame academics for this, but this is just a simplistic and not entirely accurate accusation. It is also no solution there! The first reason of the ‘adoration for the average’ can be found in a new model of governance embraced by higher education across the world.

The New Public Management radically changed universities across the world, being quasi-adopted in higher education governance across the world, with very few exceptions. Despite the ubiquitous promise, the New Public Management, with the glorification of market-based solutionism, failed to improve public service performance. There are various studies that document this fact and we can leave this aside here. It is important to observe that higher education makes no exception. This change is not marked by an increase of ‘efficiency’, quality, depth, motivation of staff and students etc.

In 2012, the sociologist Roger Burrows published an article about the contemporary academia, under governance models inspired by NPM:

“…something has changed in the [British] academy. Many academics are exhausted, stressed, overloaded, suffering from insomnia, feeling anxious, hurt, guilt, and ‘out-of-placeness’. One can observe it all around: a deep, affective, somatic crisis threatens to overwhelm us […] We know this; yet somehow we feel unable to reassert ourselves […] In our brave new world, it seems that a single final criterion of value is recognized: a quantitative, economic criterion. All else is no more than a means. And there is a single method for ensuring that this criterion is satisfied: quantified control”.

One of the most important changes of the last decades is that the new model of governance completely eliminates Trust and professional independence from universities. According to NPM, academic staff must be controlled and monitored regularly, quantifiable indicators must be achieved, tenure should be weakened or eliminated and staff downsized. This self-defeating combination was naturally associated with a profound cultural change. The main features of this new culture are determined by fear and distrust.

Of course, there are some universities doing better than others, but the systemic problem erodes the foundation of the entire system. Statistics on stress, depression and motivation in academia reveal that something is seriously wrong in some of the most well-ranked systems of higher education (adopting the preferred judgement criteria now).

We can admit that we do not have now – when we really need it – the most conducive environment to stimulate the courage required to think beyond the norms, to challenge ideas and expose fraud, pseudo-knowledge, to critique and explore, to imagine new solutions and advance knowledge. This is a time when all this is needed, because we face the awakening of some of the most horrifying ghosts of the past.

The Mediocre Campus

Recently media acknowledged in different countries what is a known unknown for at least a decade in education at all levels: many educators avoid difficult topics of debate rather than responsibly helping students to explore them. Obtuse policies are ‘shutting down debate‘ on extremism, from Shakespeare to Oedipus or F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, students require ‘trigger warnings’, so that they can withdraw in time from studying them to avoid the trauma of intense and unwanted emotions. In the US, the American Association of University Professors released the report ‘On Trigger Warnings“. Commencement speakers are banned from campuses as an insidious culture of fear, vulnerability, and ultimately intolerance, infiltrates academic life at all levels.

The groupthink strain to embrace mediocrity makes intelligent debates dangerous for one’s future and alternative views are unwanted. To deal with basic difference became so evidently difficult in campuses that comedians such as Chris Rock or Jerry Seinfeld refuse to set foot in campuses. This should terrify academics! A place where laughing is censored is not only boring… is scary as a fundamentalist stronghold!

This is why we find that a self-proclaimed intelligent crowd finds the ‘middle ground’ when journalists are slaughtered because they dare to ridicule. The argument seems to make sense, but it does not: ‘I am all for freedom of speech and all – they say – but this is too much: ridiculing that?!?” The evident fallacy is that freedom is not  working in halfs and pauses. This is also the problem with mediocrity: it blinds the minds so much that makes impossible to see how absurd is to say that anyone can be killed for drawing a cartoon. How inhuman is that. How low the person admitting that falls. This is when the ghosts of the past start to win ground fast, just before our own eyes.

The Rhinoceros by Eugène Ionesco is a play about the rise of fascism in Europe. Berenger – an indifferent and seemingly alienated character – is changed entirely by his last line, that ends the play: “I’m not capitulating!”

We have the responsibility to remind our students and fellow citizens not only how important is our freedom, how important our values are, but how fragile is democracy. We have to defend it and fight for it because… we have the knowledge and the brain to explain why we must defent it! Academics and students cannot and will not capitulate!